Perception as a product of incongruency:
Understanding "resistance based perception".
The concept of perception as a product of incongruency, or resistance, is based on the logic that anything beyond our senses is effectively beyond our resistance, such as light outside the visible spectrum, audio outside the audible spectrum, or matter lacking the density to be physically experienced, touched, or otherwise interacted with.
That which is perfectly congruent is inherently (according to Paradox Theory) imperceptible. This notion becomes quite interesting when we start to consider the concept of Time as a "carrier wave" for all sensory input data; or that any perception of time's passage is a sum of all sensory input data as marked change.
So is the perception of time's arrow as moving from the past, through the present, and into the future, a matter of congruency, unlike all other senses, or rather incongruency, aligning with all other sensory interaction?
It seems logically consistent that time's arrow is a product of time's linear violation in the exact opposite direction of our perception, thereby making it perfectly incongruent and rendering the passage of time perceptible. This opposite arrow of time is referred to, in Paradox Theory, as "Quantum Time", while the classically understood arrow of time is referred to as "Empirical Time".
It is the position of Paradox Theory that the subconscious mind may indeed be experiencing time in an exactly reverse direction of passage than the conscious mind, traveling from the (empirical) future, through the present moment, and into the (empirical) past. This notion renders our concept of linear forward moving time perception as a result of sensory adaptation, not unlike the visual cortex correcting for lens distortion by flipping vision top-to-bottom and left-to-right.
Quantum AND Empirical observers, sharing a present moment:
Understanding Quantum vs Empirical observation.
Paradox Theory posits that every empirical point of observation has a quantum counterpart, theoretically trapped in the same present moment. The sole difference between these two points of observation (in every single observational body) is their perception of the arrow of time as perfectly opposed and mirrored, in line with Paradox Theory's position of bidirectional self-similar symmetry.
Because these observers have opposite directions in the way they perceive time's arrow, they also have opposite structures of recall and prediction. These opposing recall/prediction structures are key to understanding Quantum phenomena in Paradox Theory.
The emergence of the "Quantum Sandbox":
Paradox Theory posits a hybrid many-worlds interpretation of quantum phenomena.
This conversational agency is the demonstrable quality of "Quantum Gravity" within Paradox Theory. Essentially, because of time's arrow being unidirectional for each observer in a perfectly opposing way, the ability to know what is past and the inability to know what is yet to come is the sole logical division between these two fundamental perspectives. Between the boundaries of knowledge and ignorance is the belief/doubt threshold.
The threshold between belief and doubt is critical within the bounds of Paradox Theory's position on the Quantum Sandbox with respect to its inherent mechanism and function. It is within this realm of internal malleability that conversational agency can be leveraged to, theoretically, increase and/or reduce the stability of the sandbox.
A high stability Quantum Sandbox is theoretically posited as exhibiting high similarity, or congruency, between the quantum and empirical observers, allowing for high "manifestational" potential, or seemingly high accuracy in predictive quality.
A low stability Quantum Sandbox is theoretically posited as exhibiting low similarity, or congruency, between the quantum and empirical observers, lending to low "manifestational" potential, and generally average, or even less than average, accuracy in predictive quality and power.
This is all to say, generally, someone with high "Quantum Gravity" should, in theory, be able to successfully predict, or "manifest", the outcome of Schrödinger's Cat. This effect can be seen as a resonant, or close understanding, between the empirical and quantum observers allowing for the persistence of any given individual's Quantum Sandbox.
Quantum Sandbox Interaction:
No two Quantum Sandboxes are alike...
Paradox Theory posits that the Quantum Sandbox, itself, is a novel extension of the broader cosmos, emerging as a result of two converging points of perception within any individual.
In isolation, to varying degrees, the Quantum Sandbox can be seen as existing in a state of "superposition". This effect seems to suggest the "personality" of any individual is effectively in a state of "superposition" when isolated from external observation.
In contrast, when observed, the individual's Quantum Sandbox immediately assumes a definite state. No two interactions between Sandboxes are the same, and each "relationship" between any unique pair elicits unique properties to emerge in each Sandbox.
In larger groups, the Sandbox is more flooded, and the individual may feel overwhelmed or enthused by all the company, which is assumed to be related to their confidence and/or comfort in the stability of their unique Quantum Sandbox.
Finally, each Quantum Sandbox seems isolated in a solipsistic bubble. It is understood to be the domain between the quantum and empirical enigmatic interaction, self-reflection, and autonomous self-regulation, and is theoretically described using the Fundamental Paradox Theory Formula.
